1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Make ''income'' only build banneable

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by teemu tiainen, Jul 8, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. teemu tiainen

    teemu tiainen Member

    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    3
    this ruins game for team mate who does it... and its un fun and annotying so i wish it will be banneable if reported
     
    Nacccho likes this.
  2. Themryon

    Themryon Member

    Messages:
    478
    Likes Received:
    198
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Lol mate, the game is the game and you can play it how you want. Are you also gonna ask for people to be banned if they dont communicate?
     
    Pepperpiet likes this.
  3. GvR Mr Mister

    GvR Mr Mister Member

    Messages:
    413
    Likes Received:
    157
    Trophy Points:
    43
    In a competitive, ranked game this sounds like a valid reason :p Its part of the game to communicate
     
    Pepperpiet likes this.
  4. Gaetor

    Gaetor Member

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    8
    You can't FORCE people to communicate, either way some people will never do so.
    Would need to ban 1/3th of players I am matched with.
     
  5. Gaetor

    Gaetor Member

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    8
    For your next post, please watch your grammar/english a bit man.
    Regarding your statement, LegionTD (like any game with strategy involved) has many ways to build/play... you can't ban people for not following the "right" way, this will kill any form of creativity as players will be affraid to be banned if they dont follow the "right" way.
     
    Pepperpiet likes this.
  6. Akitos

    Akitos Member

    Messages:
    542
    Likes Received:
    383
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Back in WC3 LTD refusing to cooperate was a bannable offense. Sadly you cannot do something like this in a standalone game.
     
    Nacccho likes this.
  7. Gaetor

    Gaetor Member

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    8
    It was "bannable", many hosts didnt do anything with it though... or they'd just make a new online account.
    In this case banning them would restrict them from entire use of the game and indeed therefor I'd say that's a no-go..

    Perhaps we can have a cooldown on ranked matches for people that do such?
    Like, play 25 casual games before unlocking ranked again?
     
  8. GvR Mr Mister

    GvR Mr Mister Member

    Messages:
    413
    Likes Received:
    157
    Trophy Points:
    43
    So you want a game-delayed ban, not a timed one? Im not talking about a overall permaban making people unable to play. Just sth that prevents them from playing more rankeds without communicating (which is pure tk in a competitive team game) for x hours/games.
    I dont mind people playing casual and not to talk, but its a no-go in rankeds imo.
    Maybe sth like the leaverbuster, if you did not ping and talk in the last game, you get a notification in lobby. When you continue playing ranked games without communicating, you will get a 1h ban for ranked games, increasing with every game you dont talk.
     
  9. Gaetor

    Gaetor Member

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    8
    What you just said is precisely as I suggested.. just hours instead of games which makes no difference to me (rather than games truly being felt and hours are just waiting it out playing other games)
     
  10. Nacccho

    Nacccho Member

    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    43
    I fully support some kind of punishment for absolute "rogue" players.

    But don't know if its viable, because it is a paid game and will hurt the playerbase.
     
  11. Themryon

    Themryon Member

    Messages:
    478
    Likes Received:
    198
    Trophy Points:
    43
    It is just a bad idea to punish players for that
     
  12. Marchombre

    Marchombre Member

    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    67
    Trophy Points:
    28
    This will prob lead to players sending one message "." " " or "gl hf" and not communicate for the rest of the game.

    I mean, if someone doesn't want to communicate, no automatic system will prevent that.

    I also saw "passive" players following your calls without saying a single word nor using any ping.
    Is this bannable ? Those guys do save /send with you, leading to victory.
     
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2018
    Pepperpiet likes this.
  13. Diocletir

    Diocletir Member

    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    8
    and something u didnt think about, Permasending was meta at some point in game. This game is ever changing and so is the meta so who know whether it will be meta again.
    So I don't think Perma sending is a bannable offense.

    While i agree that it there should be something like a ranked timeout for not communicating.
     
    Gaetor and foliesseer like this.
  14. Themryon

    Themryon Member

    Messages:
    478
    Likes Received:
    198
    Trophy Points:
    43
    As you can see in de new thread "bannable behavior faq", this discussion has become pointless and common sense has won; it is not bannable. Thank god.
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2018
    foliesseer likes this.
  15. Respawnkarre

    Respawnkarre Member

    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Mby you create mode for incomers then problem is solved.
     
  16. atonic

    atonic Member

    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Hello, Pot. Meet Kettle.
     
    GvR Mr Mister and jitsuc4 like this.
  17. Gaetor

    Gaetor Member

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    8
    ???
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.